top of page
The-Butterfly-Effect Logo_Right.jpg

cont'd...

Critics of the "Ground Zero Mosque" suggested that Osama bin Laden and the hijackers’ greatest triumph would be to see a mosque built as a monument to their “victory.”  First of all, I think bin Laden's reaction would have probably been the exact opposite.  Imams like Feisal Abdul Rauf were Osama bin Laden's worst enemies because he deeply resented, and was openly hostile, to Muslims with moderate Islamist orientations.  But even beyond that, the construction of a building pales in comparison to the terrorists' victory if we allow them to deconstruct the moral code of this country.  It would have been extraordinary to have had brave leaders who possessed the fortitude and courage to do what is right, even if it happens to be unpopular at the time.  The Cordoba House controversy was the perfect opportunity for our leaders to challenge Americans to 1) acknowledge the pain of the past but, at the same time, move forward with greater understanding and tolerance; 2) remember that the War on Terror is not a war against Islam; and 3) make an attempt to reconcile the American way of life with the peaceful believers of the world’s second-largest religion. 

To be clear, I am not saying that our leaders necessarily failed us by not demanding that the Cordoba House be built near Ground Zero.  I am simply saying that a new narrative is of the greatest consequence in both domestic issues and in our broader struggle against Islamic extremists, and that we need leaders with the guts to tell us so.  Almost three decades have passed since the First Gulf War and still we all have a dangerously inadequate knowledge of the many divisions, complexities and nuances within the Islamic community.  Many Americans and American leaders still view the Muslim world as a single terrifying entity.  

 

According to a Time poll taken at the time, 61% of Americans who responded opposed the construction of the Cordoba House project, and over 70% felt that continuing with the plan would be an insult to the victims of the attacks on the World Trade Center.  Although I disagree with the majority, I vigorously defend their right to their opinion.  Whether we agree or not, most Americans are perfectly capable of having a reasonable and civil discourse on sensitive matters.   

 

Unfortunately, that level of maturity did not serve the purpose of those with a political agenda, so what happened next in the debate has become the standard.  Civilized dialogue turned into cultural warfare as the conversation metastasized into an opportunity for politicians and crazy people to exhibit absolutely despicable behavior.  All of their talk about “of course they have the right to build it there but...” and “radical Islam is not a majority of Islam but...” was nothing more than a smokescreen for the politically motivated to incite their small but suspicious audience with hate-filled rhetoric.

 

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich seemed to speak for many Republicans when he then proclaimed:  “Nazis don’t have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust museum in Washington” and “we would never accept the Japanese putting up a site next to Pearl Harbor” and “there should be no mosque near Ground Zero in New York so long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia.”  That’s just great.  Now we have lowered ourselves to Saudi Arabian standards?  Martin Peretz, the editor in chief of The New Republic, wrote, “I wonder whether I need honor these people and pretend they are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment, which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse.”

 

These are not harmless games being played.  What in the past may have been dismissed as “politics as usual” has become truly dangerous.  Enlightenment is not necessary to simply soothe hurt feelings; it’s a matter of life-and-death.  If President George W. Bush had been more knowledgeable of the enormous disparities between the Salafist jihadists of al-Qaeda and the secular Baathists of Iraq, his war plans may have looked far different.  

 

There is no question that there are radicals in Islam; there are terrorists; there are full-blown nut cases.  I have seen firsthand the destruction being committed in the name of Islam – the extensive oppression of females, young girls being subjected to genital mutilation, and warlords in Africa who pillage, rape, and murder in the name of their religion.  But to suggest that this small percentage of horrendous behavior extends to the entirety of the Islamic faith is just wrong.  My heart breaks for the millions of Muslims who must feel completely demoralized and misunderstood.  All of the incredibly brave people who I have seen put their lives at risk to fight oppression, educate females, condemn genital mutilation, and protect rape victims and orphans.  These are wonderful people and they don’t deserve this.

 

There was only one big winner in this controversy:  al-Qaeda, who mocked us while we essentially did their recruiting for them.  Once again, we gave terrorist organizations a perfect opportunity to frame America's image for a vulnerable portion of the Muslim world.  As former FBI terrorist interrogator Ali Soufan put it, Osama bin Laden’s “next video script has just written itself.”  Zabihullah, a Taliban operative, told Newsweek, “By preventing this mosque from being built, America is doing us a big favor.  It’s providing us with more recruits, donations, and popular support.  The more mosques you stop, the more jihadis we will get.”  Zabihullah went on to explain how this issue is such a boost for their cause that it now leads the agenda in Taliban meetings with existing members and potential recruits. “We talk about how America tortures with waterboarding, about the cruel confinement of Muslims in wire cages in Guantánamo, about the killing of innocent women and children in air attacks – and now America gives us another gift with its street protests to prevent a mosque from being built in New York,” Zabihullah says. “Showing reality always makes the best propaganda.” #TheButterflyEffect 

 

 

 

 

The most heartbreaking consequence of the Cordoba House debate is the damage the rhetoric undoubtedly did to our troops who were fighting so honorably for freedom.  I can only imagine their bewilderment and dismay as they watched this madness play out stateside, while they endured sandstorms and gunfire to be our faithful ambassadors of democracy and freedom.

In 2015, it was announced that a developer was building a 667-foot glass condominium building on what would have been the Cordoba House site.  According to their website units sell for up to $13 million.

###

 

 

 

 

 

Evidence:

Cordoba House.  "Founder's Vision."  29 Sept 2018

Cordoba House.  "Mission and Vision."  29 Sept 2018

Alex Altman.  “Majority Oppose Mosque, Many Distrust Muslims.”  Time. 19 Aug 2010 
Andy Barr.  “Newt Gingrich Compares Mosque to Nazis.”  Politico.com. 16 Aug 2010

Ali Soufan.  “The National Security Mosque.”  Forbes.com. 18 Aug 2010

Sami Yousafzai.  “Taliban Using Mosque Controversy to Recruit."  Newsweek. 30 Aug 2010

bottom of page